TSGL: DING DONG THE WITCH IS GONE...YAHOO!!!
Beezersmom at aol.com
Beezersmom at aol.com
Wed Mar 7 20:00:15 EST 2007
Please read this message and my email sent to Olivia and returned to
me..USER UNKNOWN
Toni
In a message dated 3/7/2007 7:54:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
MAILER-DAEMON at aol.com writes:
The original message was received at Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:54:19 -0500 (EST)
from root at localhost
*** ATTENTION ***
Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.
Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
--AOL Postmaster
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<Thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com>
<<< 550 5.1.1 No such user 39si541899wrl
550 <Thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com>... User unknown
Final-Recipient: RFC822; Thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 No such user 39si541899wrl
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:54:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Beezersmom at aol.com
by imo-m14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id o.d43.3dc5aad (32914)
for <Thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:54:19 -0500 (EST)
Return-path: <Beezersmom at aol.com>
From: Beezersmom at aol.com
Message-ID: <d43.3dc5aad.3320b8bb at aol.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:54:19 EST
Subject: Re: TSGL: Messages not going through ??
To: Thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-----------------------------1173315259"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5036
X-Spam-Flag: NO
In a message dated 3/7/2007 7:54:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, Beezersmom
writes:
Hi Olivia
I hope you don't mind me writing you off list and if you do, I'm sorry.
Please just let me know and I won't do it again.
I know that I did send you a response to your email through the list,
Subject: Messages not going through ?? Sun Mar 4 16:59:52 EST 2007
My message was mostly in regard to this email: On 2/27/07, jonpan
<jonpan at onlinehome.de> wrote:
who also sent you this message below.
As you can see as I originally told you in my on list email to you that
John is really a nice man and he is and I hope you take to "heart" this email
from him that his main concern is to keep this list afloat, just like
everyone that's
on this list.
We have some very nice and brillant people on this list and one of them is
Raymond. I don't quite understand your attack on him in this email: ATTN:
RAYMOND.........Re: Antispyware Win2K Sat Mar 3 18:05:39 EST 2007
and especially this one along with questioning his CISSP: ATTN:
RAYMOND.........Re: Antispyware Win2K Mon Mar 5 23:23:20 EST 2007
Raymond has helped me on list and off list for about 2 years now and he even
did some work for me at his home. He's been very good to me, as has his
wife, and as far as I know to everyone on this list. I'm also sure that he will
respond to my email because it's very possible that he is extremely busy
with his "paying" job and his job does come first and not the list.
Raymond & I have had our differences but that's life just as some of the
others on the list have had their differences but everything seems to work
itself out and life does go own.
Whatever your problem is with Raymond is none of our business and it
honestly should be kept off list. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.
All we want is our list to be like it use to be and run smoothly.
Take care and have a nice evening
Toni
Sometimes we are so busy adding up our troubles
that we forget to count our blessings.
In a message dated 3/7/2007 7:15:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jonpan at onlinehome.de writes:
Olivia,
Thank you for your comments.
You do realise that I am trying to avoid the dissolution of the list?
My remarks were addressed to the active members, some of whom are
considering
withdrawing their participation.
I would prefer your support in my endeavours and hope the list can be
rescued.
John
Od/G
.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olivia Francis" <thecrosseyedcow at gmail.com>
To: "Tech Support Guy Mailing List" <list at tsgserver.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: TSGL: Messages not going through ??
Hello John
You state
<Oh, guys, just shrug your shoulders and think, "I'll do what I can...">
With an attitude like that from you and evidently the vast majority of the
members it's no wonder the list is run so poorly.
Olivia
On 2/27/07, jonpan <jonpan at onlinehome.de> wrote:
>
> Oh, guys, just shrug your shoulders and think, "I'll do what I can..."
>
> I like the format of this list better than anything else and, above all,
> the
> attitude of the members is the best. It's like having good friends round
> the
> corner.
>
> Don't give up!
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
> Od/G
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tilman Brandl" <arbit at gmx.at>
> To: "Tech Support Guy Mailing List" <list at tsgserver.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: TSGL: Messages not going through ??
>
>
> John,
>
> it's 3 days since you sent this reply which I get to see now - that's
> simply
> too much.
>
> >I am not aware of any undue delays in mail to or from me within
> this country for other 'Lists' or for private mail <
>
> Same here. I'm with several mailing lists (mostly US based) and have heaps
> of email (mostly European) - only at VERY rare occassions do I encounter
> any
> delays. So TSGL is a very special case indeed.
>
> >For me at least, it is completely unworkable to offer support in any
> sort of timely manner<
>
> Again, the same here.
>
> Guess I'll watch things a little bit longer. But then - if things don't
> get
> improved, I'll probably leave although this IS or was till recently my
> favorite place re. TechHelp on the Web.
>
> Regards
> Tilman
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: John S
> An: Tech Support Guy Mailing List
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2007 18:35
> Betreff: Re: TSGL: Messages not going through ??
>
>
> Tilman Brandl wrote:
> > is there any known problem with the list server that I've missed
> > information about?
> >
> > Yesterday I've gathered my strength (and rest of free time) to answer
> > to one of the queries - "LSASS: necessary windows component or trojan
> > ??". Sofar nothing has come back to me, which isn't the first time.
> > Any known problems? Or just the recurring 'black hole' effect ?
> Hi Tilman,
> Patience is a virtue with TSGL at the moment. Of late I have noticed
> what you are experiencing and have been waiting to see if there is some
> sort of pattern occurring with our delayed and lost posts before writing
> something to Mike Cermack about what or perhaps where the problem could
> be. It's evident from what I'm seeing that it is a TSG only mail
> handler problem. Could be directly associated with or caused by the
> high volume of posts going through the TSG forums.
>
> I have my email client set to list/sort headers in the date:time order
> that they were received by their sender's ISP relative to GMT/UTC. Your
> above message took (in round figures) 7hrs to come through TSGL to me.
> Over the past couple weeks I've seen TSGL messages come in typically 1
> to 3 full days after being sent - jonpan holds the current record of
> 4-days for one of his very recent posts to come through to me. I have
> witnessed my own posts come back in anything from 7-minutes to 3-days
> after I sent them. I have seen mine and other's posts being replied to
> by others again up to two days before seeing mine or another parties
> original post.
>
> Some original posts are simply not delivered to me at all. Of those not
> seen to be delivered, they are not getting diverted to other Inbox
> subfolders via my mail rules. I do not have any special mail handling
> i.e. anti-spam or anti-virus and the like intervention applied by my
> ISP. I am not aware of any undue delays in mail to or from me within
> this country for other 'Lists' or for private mail - 'tis most always
> just minutes making the round trip via such Lists out of this country to
> the USA and back around the clock. So that cuts out general ''Internet
> congestion'' as being a cause for these extreme delays to lost
> altogether mail. At present I can't see any pattern emerging other than
> this is a TSGL-only issue.
>
> For me at least, it is completely unworkable to offer support in any
> sort of timely manner. Unless a clear cut, well put together 'problem'
> is posted, that doesn't require the asking of a lot more info, (meaning
> a lot more delay is likely) I'm simply not bothering until this issue is
> resolved.
>
> Best... ~ John S.
> _______________________________________________
> Tech Support Guy Mailing List
> http://www.tsgserver.com/list/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech Support Guy Mailing List
> http://www.tsgserver.com/list/
>
_______________________________________________
Tech Support Guy Mailing List
http://www.tsgserver.com/list/
_______________________________________________
Tech Support Guy Mailing List
http://www.tsgserver.com/list/
____________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at _AOL.com_
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=http://www.aol.com) .
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.
More information about the List
mailing list